·
EAD
( Exposure at Default)-
Estimated future additional draws of principal and
accrued but unpaid interest and fees that are likely to occur over a one- year horizon assuming
the wholesale exposure or the retail exposures in the segment were to go into default.
EAD=max {0, [(Exposure—Collateral) +PFE]},
For
Stress - PFE (Potential Future Exposure)-
99th
%ile, one-tailed confidence interval for an increase in the value of(Exposure—Collateral) over a five-business-day holding
period for repo-style transactions or over a ten- business-day holding period
for eligible margin loans using a minimum one-year historical observation.
For the off-balance sheet component of a wholesale
exposure or segment of retail exposures EAD means the notional amount of the
exposure or segment.
Margin
Loans – Credit collateralized by liquid assets. Ex.
readily available marketable debt.
·
LGD=
An, account of historical losses
that a firm suffers due to counterparty defaults, frauds, damages, etc. 50 %
for unsecured transaction and 70 % for subordinate debt.
A. When Collateral is there and
there is chance of double default or counterparty credit risk-
LGD = LGD * E▪/E
Where E▪ = max (0, [EAD*(1+
He) – C * (1-Hc – Hfx)]
He = Haircut Appropriate for
exposure.
Hc = Haircut Appropriate for
Collateral.
Hfx = Haircut Appropriate for
Foreign exchange.
Haircut is defined as %age by which asset value, margin,
collateral or currency market value is devalued.
B. LGD =
Economic Loss / Exposure at Default
= [Exposure at Default – PV*(Recoveries or collateral) +
PV*(Costs)] / Exposure at Default.
PV is a function of Discount rate
= Estimating discount rates as
o
Weighted average cost of capital- WACC = Wd*(Kd)*(1-t)
+ Wpfd*(Kpfd) + (We)*(Ke).
Kpfd = Dividend / Share Price.
o
Opportunity cost of funds.
C. LGD =
-
1-
Recovery Rate.
Recovery Rate –
1. By Beta Distribution-
Alpha- tells us center,
And Beta tells us shape
Alpha = {(LGD Mean) ^2 * (1 - LGD Mean) / Variance LGD)} – Mean LGD.
Beta- Tells us shape-
= Alpha * [(1/Mean LGD) – 1]
Recovery Rate = alpha / (Alpha + Beta).
LGD averages and standard deviations are estimated
by a historical analysis of recovery history.
2. Value Recovery Process Models=
= Recovery value/ PV of Future Cash Flows
3. Instantaneous
Recovery Rate Models
·
For
bonds, it is possible to determine market recovery rates, which can be
calculated as the ratio of the actual market price and the nominal
value
Identify stress points based on
historical default rates and/or macroeconomic indicators, estimate default
rates during these stressed conditions and calculate their averages. Plug these
default rates into a stressed LGD model.
Compute weighted average LGD across
these stress points and compare them with average LGD over the cycle. Use the
higher of the two for capital calculation purposes. Scaling factor of 1.06 for
BASEL AND 1.25 for CAD (EU) to reflect downturn risk.
The
BCBS Basel III minimum requirements impose a downturn LGD floor of 10 per
cent for Residential mortgage portfolio and 15% for High Volatile Commercial
Real Estate.
·
PD
( Probability of Default)-
Retail
Credit: Logistic regression is the de-facto industry
standard for, Modeling PD for retail exposures.
Wholesale
Credit: Historically, qualitative scorecards have been
used to assign ratings to wholesale obligors.
The PD for each wholesale obligor or
retail segment may not be less than 3 %.
Method – 1
·
By logistic regression to
calculate PD and incorporated macroeconomic variables-
Dependent Variable-
Taking two Non default companies assigning Dependent variable as zero and by taking two default companies data assigning 1 to them.
Taking two Non default companies assigning Dependent variable as zero and by taking two default companies data assigning 1 to them.
Default companies, Among nonbanks-
only one institution initially rated 'AAA' has ever defaulted--
- Ally Financial, formerly known as GMAC Financial, a subsidiary of General Motors Corp. S&P downgraded Ally to 'SD' from 'CC'
Among Banks-
only one institution initially rated 'AAA' has ever defaulted--
- Ally Financial, formerly known as GMAC Financial, a subsidiary of General Motors Corp. S&P downgraded Ally to 'SD' from 'CC'
Among Banks-
The
largest banks to be acquired have been the presumed
Merrill Lynch acquisition by Bank of America,
the Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual acquisitions by JPMorgan Chase, and
the Countrywide Financial acquisition also by Bank of America.
Merrill Lynch acquisition by Bank of America,
the Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual acquisitions by JPMorgan Chase, and
the Countrywide Financial acquisition also by Bank of America.
Independent Variables- Historical
Data-
·
Profitability ratios-
Operating Profit Margin, Interest Coverage Ratio,
Return on Equity.
· Leverage Ratio- Debt/ Equity, Debt Ratio – (Debt / Total Assets),
· Activity ratio – Accounts Receivable Ratio, Payable Ratio.
· Liquidity Ratio- Quick Ratio, Operating Cash Flow Ratio (OCF / Total Debt.
· Coverage Ratio:- Debt to Service coverage , Interest service coverage ratio.
Ratios with high correlation with default rates and linear relation should be selected.
·
Macroeconomic variables like (GDP growth, Interest Rates, CPI, and HPI
etc.) of current economic conditions.
Than after getting Logit for variables mentioned above in different time
horizons.
·
Financial ratios that have the highest correlation
coefficients (r) with the individual possibility of default were selected.
Used equation = e*L/(1 + e*L) to get PD. PDs from averages of historical default rates
Assigned ratings (0,.5) - Reliable
(.5, 1)- Non Reliable companies.
-
Then, the rating is subsequently mapped to a master
scale to derive PDs.
-
For stress testing historical values were taken as in
recessionary or mild recession period).
The highest (Max), the least (Min) values and the
median (Me) of financial ratios and the individual possibility of default (p)
were found. The intervals of values were divided into two parts: from Min to Me
and from Me to Max (Fig. 2). Every of these two parts were divided into 4 equal
intervals. The scores (0-7) were attributed to these 8 intervals. The higher
scores indicate the stronger financial condition of companies. So the highest
scores were attributed to companies which were characterized by low debt ratio
(IK1) and low individual possibility of default (p).
Altman Model for Ratings-
= 1.2 * (WC/TA) + 1.4 * (RE/TA) + 3.3 * (EBIT/TA) + 0.6 * (MC/Debt)
+ Sales/ Total Assets.
Score > 3.1 “Good”
1.8 > Score > 3.1 “Grey Period”.
Score < 1.8 “Bankruptcy”
Analysis of Logistic Regression Output’s-
-
Multiple R - The correlation coefficient between the
observed and predicted values. It ranges in value from 0 to 1. A small value
indicates that there is little or no linear relationship between the dependent
variable and the independent variables.
-
R- Square- Square
of Correlation i.e square of multiple R. It ranges from zero to one, with zero indicating that the proposed model does not
improve prediction over the mean
model and one indicating perfect prediction.
-
Adjusted R- Square - Adjusted
R2 is used to compensate for the addition of variables to the model. Adjusted
R-squared will decrease as predictors are added if the increase in model fit
does not make up for the loss of degrees of freedom. Likewise, it will increase
as predictors are added if the increase in model fit is worthwhile.
-
Significance F – Tells us that output is not by
chance. Smaller the value greater the probability that output is not by chance.
Significance F tells us the probability about the output is a good fit.
-
P-Value - Smaller the value greater the probability that output is
not by chance.
-
F – Regression Mean Square / Residual Mean
Square.
-
Sum of Squares due to
Regression- is
a quantity used in describe how well a regression model, represents the data
being modeled. In particular, the explained sum of squares measures how much variation there is in the modeled values and
this is compared to the total sum of squares, which Used for
t-test and f-test calculations.
-
Residuals-
are the difference between the observed values and those predicted by the
regression equation.
-
Residual sum of squares- measures
how much variation there is in the observed data, and to the, which measures
the variation in the modeling errors. A smaller residual sum of squares is
ideal.
-
Mean Square –
Sum of Square / Degrees of Freedom.
-
Residual Mean Square - .
A smaller residual sum of squares is ideal.
Basel III Supplemental Market Risk
Capital Requirements
1.
The Existing Value at Risk based
Capital Requirement.
Maximum
of -
·
VaR (99.9% of one tailed confidence
interval at 10 days VaR).
·
Average of these metrics over the
previous 60 business days.
Maximum value is then multiplied by
multiplier m.
VaR Calculated as –
Inputs - Portfolio
Value, Volatility in currency (from Historical record), Confidence Interval
(99.9 %).
Calculating –
Student t distribution –
TINV (1 – CI) ^2, Degree of Freedom = Say is x.
VaR = x * Volatility.
Multiplier “m” depends on
exceptions (If the quarterly back testing shows that the bank's daily net trading loss
exceeded its corresponding daily VaR-based measure, a back testing exception
has occurred) while validating the model-
¨
Green
Zone : 0-4
exceptions
¨
Yellow
zone : 5-9 exceptions
¨
Red
zone : 10
or more exceptions
1.
Minimum of 3. Than addition to this
should be between (0, 1). Means maximum of 4.
2.
4 or fewer exceptions = 3.
3.
5 exceptions = 3.4
4.
6 exceptions = 3.5
VaR = max ( Var of Last
10 days, multiplier * Average VaR of Last 60 Days)
2.
A Stressed Long Term Capital
Requirement.
Same as VaR of Basel 11 except-
10-day, 99th %ile, one-tailed confidence interval value-at-risk measure of the current portfolio, with model
inputs calibrated to historical data from a continuous 12-month period of
significant financial stress relevant to the bank’s portfolio.
The
stressed VaR should be calculated at least weekly.
3.
A Long Term Incremental Risk Charge.
The Long‐Term Incremental Risk Charge (LTIRC) for a bank’s
portfolio under the IMA requires estimates of future
credit losses arising from specific risks (default and migration) over a
one‐year capital horizon under the entire range of potential risk factor
vector and yield curve sample paths.
·
An one‐year capital
horizon at a 99.9% confidence level.
·
In liquidity horizon
( the time to liquidate or hedge a given exposure) be less than the smaller of three months or the contractual
maturity of the position
is to be that which would prevail in stressed
market conditions and cannot
4.
A Comprehensive Risk Capital
Requirement.
The Comprehensive Risk Capital Requirement represents an
estimate of all price risks of the bank’s portfolio of correlation trading
positions over a one‐year time horizon at the 99.9% confidence level, again
assuming maintenance of a constant level of risk over the one‐year capital
horizon.
Correlation positions include:
A securitization position for which all or substantially all of the value of
each of the underlying exposures is
based on the credit quality of a single actively traded company, or
A non‐securitization position that hedges a securitization position described
above.
Calculation by detailed analysis of the
default adjusted performance of each underlying exposure, with special
attention to the degree of co‐variation in such performance.
5.
A Specific Risk Charge.
Specific
risk is the risk of losses of market risk exposures caused by factors other
than broad market movements, including event risk and idiosyncratic risk
(assets with zero or no correlation with market). E.x. News that is specific to
either one stock
or a group of companies, such as the loss of a patent or a major natural
disaster, labor problems, management records to adapt changes.
6.
General market risk or Systematic
Risk- is defined as changes in the market value of positions resulting from
broad market movements, such as changes in the general level of interest rates,
equity prices, foreign exchange rates, or commodity prices.
·
Specific Risk Charge –
Maturity
|
Coupon
|
Value
|
|
A
|
45 days
|
12.5%
|
25
|
B
|
9
months
|
9
|
-15
(short)
|
.3% for time band 0- 6 months.
1.125% for 6 – 24 months.
1.8% for 24 or more
- Based on maturity charge on A =
.3% of 25
And on B is = 1.125% of -15.
·
General Risk Charge (Systematic Risk)-
Based on market movements.
Net Open position + vertical Disallowance + Horizontal Disallowance.
Net Open Position –
Is calculated on net open position (Long + Short (Short has –ve value)
positions) of the zone. As, for 1 to 3 months and for 3 to 6 months and 9 to 12
months.
Modified duration multiply by exposure (Value) of each position than
adding all.
Vertical Allowance – Applicable when positions are offset
(smallest of mode of amount in time band) with in time bracket.
Because of Basis Risk. Calculated on offset amount.
Value * Modified Duration * 5%.
Vertical disallowance is applicable under 3-6 month time band and 7.3- 9.3
year time band.
Horizontal Allowance –Netting of long short position
across time bands. Est Than smallest of
mode of amount across time bands. When
positions are offset in time bracket.
Because of imperfect correlation of prices across different maturities.
Yield curve risk.
·
Total risk Charge for bonds – Specific Charge + General risk
charge.
·
Total Capital Charge for Equity
Position – 11.25%
(Specific Risk Charge) of Gross Equity Position + 9% (General Risk Charge) of
Gross Equity Position.
·
Total Capital Charge for Foreign
Exchange & Gold Portfolio – 9% (Specific Risk Charge) of Net Position + 9% (General
Risk Charge) of Net Position.
·
There is No specific risk charge on
Derivatives Position.
General risk Charge is applied in same manner as for equities, Bonds and
Foreign Exchange & gold Portfolios.
Capital
Adequacy Directive (Market Risk same as in Basel) is based on the European
Union version of Basel. Scaling Factor 1.25 is used in calculation instead of
1.06 as in Basel.
RAROC ( Risk Adjusted
Return on Capital)-
An adjustment to the
return on an investment that accounts for the element of risk. Risk-adjusted return on capital (RAROC) gives decision
makers the ability to compare the returns on several different projects
with varying risk levels. Also used for performance
evaluation.
Asset
Correlation-
Joint Behavior of asset values of borrowers. Decreasing
function of PD but increasing function of Asset size.
Calculated as-For Residential, Corporate, Sovereign =
0.12 + 0.12 * e^ (50 * PD).
For HVCRE – 0.12 + 0.18 * e ^(50 * PD).
1. Estimates of asset
correlations were developed through a two-step process.
-
First, economic
capital allocations for single-family mortgages were generated using these
models of mortgage credit risk calibrated with industry data.
-
Second, an asset-correlation parameter was “reverse
engineered” to match as closely as possible the capital charges implied by the
Basel II formula with the economic capital allocations derived.
2. Can be calculated by
Regression Analysis-
a) Put X range and Y
range
b) In the result
adjusted R- Square is the correlation.
·
Stress
Testing –
Stress testing is fairly developed in the area of
market risk.
Same
as VaR of Basel 11 except-
10-day, 99.9th %ile,
one-tailed confidence interval value-at-risk measure of the current portfolio, with model
inputs calibrated to historical data from a continuous 12-month period of
significant financial stress relevant to the bank’s portfolio
Banks do that
Sensitivity Analysis for Stress
Testing-
Discovering which risk factors have the biggest
impact on the portfolio risk in terms of the VaR or whatever is used for the
evaluation of unexpected losses, is the target and the benefit of sensitivity
analysis.
Ø Unexpected loss = VaR – Expected
Loss (PD*EAD*LGD).
Ø Unexpected Loss = EAD * {PD *
σ^2(LGD) + (LGD) ^2* σ^2(PD)} ^.5
o
σ^2(PD)
= PD * (1-PD)
Usually done by modeling risk parameters as a
function of stressed macroeconomic variables (e.g.,
GDP, interest rate risk, foreign exchange
Risk, equity price risk, and commodity
price risk, unemployment rate,
Inflation, CPI, HPI etc.) Corresponding to
different downturn conditions (e.g., mild recession, severe recession, etc.) e.x.
·
Oil crisis 1973/1974
·
Stock market crash (Black Monday 1987, global bond price crash 1994,
Asia 1998).
·
Terrorist attacks (New York 9/11 2001, Madrid 2004) or wars (Gulf war
1990/1991, Iraq war 2003)
·
Currency crisis (Asian 1997, European Exchange Rate Mechanism crisis
1992, Mexican Peso crisis 1994).
·
Emerging market crisis
·
Failure of LTCM5 and/or Russian default (1998)
And compare the capital requirements against
their current capital level.
Calculate the unexpected loss as the
difference between VaR for a confidence level of 99.99% and expected loss.
Other model,
the projected figures for the main macroeconomic variables are used to estimate
the future income statement and balance sheet of each company and on this basis
to calculate individual probabilities of default
(PDs). Data are then aggregated to estimate the
banking sectors
Total
loan loss.
·
Data
Validation-
Back-testing procedure consists of calculating the
number of times that the operational losses fall outside the VaR estimates,
these are called exceptions.
Banks have to validate their models on an ongoing
basis.
Model should be validated in every 10 days.
Is used to calculate multiplication factor.
If
the quarterly back testing shows that the bank's daily net trading loss
exceeded its corresponding daily VaR-based measure, a back testing exception
has occurred.
Model for Data Validation-
Hosmer and Lemeshow or Chi- Square.
Five
groups were formed. For every group the average estimated default Probability
is calculated and used to derive the expected number of defaults per group.
Next, this number is compared with the amount of realized defaults in the
respective group. Then, test statistic of groups is used for the estimation
sample is chi-square distributed in turn calculating p-value for the rating
model.
Calculated as =
P-Value – The closer the
p-value is to zero, the worse the estimation is.
o k = (number of rating classes), ni
= number of companies in rating class i, Di is the
number of defaulted obligors in class i, pi is the
forecasted probability of default for rating class i
o Compare
with p-value.
o No
critical value of p that could be used to determine whether the
estimated PD’s are correct or not
o The
closer the p-value is to zero the worse the estimation is .
o First
–all else equal, the greater the chi square number, the stronger the
relationship between the dependent and independent variable.
o Second
–the lower the probability associated with a chi-square statistic, the stronger
the relationship between the dependent and independent variable.
o Third
–If your probability is .05 or less, then you can generalize from a random
sample to a population, and claim the two variables are associated in the
population.
Numerator covers tier 1, tier 2, tier
and
·
The
sum of tier 2 and tier 3 capital allocated for market risk may not exceed 250 %
of tier 1 capital. As a result tier
1 capital must equal at least 28.6 % of the measure for market risk.
·
The sum of tier 2 (both allocated and excess) and
allocated tier 3 capital may not exceed 100 % of tier 1 capital (both allocated
and excess)
·
Term
subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock and related surplus
included in tier 2 capitals (both allocated and excess) may not exceed 50 % of
tier 1 capital (both allocated and excess).
·
Tier
3 capital is subordinated debt that is unsecured, is fully paid up, has an
original maturity of at least two years, is not redeemable before maturity.
Ø Capital Adequacy Directive III (CAD III) increased capital requirements for
the trading book and complex securitization positions and introduced stressed
value-at-risk capital requirements and higher capital requirements for
re-securitizations for both in the banking and trading book.
Ø Liquidity coverage ratio- The liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) will
require banks to have sufficient high quality liquid assets to withstand a 30-day
stressed funding scenario that is specified by supervisors. Will, be introduced in 2015.
(Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets / Net Cash Outflow for 30
days) >=100%.
Ø Net Stable Funding - ratio measures the amount of
available longer-term stable sources of funding over the required amount under
a one year stress scenario. Will, be
introduced in 2018.
(Available Stable Funding / Required Stable Funding) >=100%.
Ø Covered Positions are defined as all on- and off-balance sheet positions in the
Bank’s
trading account.
Covered positions exclude all positions in the trading account that, in form or
substance, act as liquidity facilities that provide liquidity support to
asset-backed commercial paper.
Ø Maturity Mismatch- occurs
when the residual maturity of a credit risk mitigant is less than that of the
hedged exposure(s). 3 months.
Ø Leverage Ratio – (Tier 1 / Balance sheet and other off Balance
Sheet Exposures) >= 3%
Ø Free Cash Flow- A measure of
financial performance calculated as operating cash flow minus capital
expenditures.
Macroeconomic variables
·
Interest
Rate at a Particular Tenor on a Specified Yield Curve Denominated in a Given
Currency
·
Underlying Risk Factor for a Dynamic Yield
Curve Model for a Specified Yield Curve in a Given Currency
·
Spot FX Rate Between a Base Currency
Denomination and Another Currency Denomination
·
Equity Market Index with a Specified Market
Symbol in a Given Currency Denomination
·
Black
Scholes Implied Volatility for an Option Contract on an Underlying Asset, Rate
Index, or Spot FX Rate.
·
The
economic value of securitization tranche instruments (securitized assets and
synthetic CDOs) as the expected present value of projected future tranche cash flows
by applying Monte Carlo pricing methods. The present value of future tranche
cash flows is calculated using discount rates obtained from the pricing yield
curve applicable to the securitization
tranche instrument.
·
Interest
Rate Spread on a Specified Category of Bonds in a Specified Currency
Denomination
·
Interest
Rate Spread on Bonds with a Specified Credit Rating
·
Macroeconomic
Risk Factors such as GDP Indices, CPI, Purchasing Power parity ,Industrial
Production index, Inflation Rates, or
Housing Price Indices
·
Performance
Risk Factors for Industries, Asset Classes, or Other Market Segments
·
Credit
Risk Factors such as Obligor Default Intensity and Recovery Rate
·
Counterparty‐Specific
Risk Factors Representing Idiosyncratic Risk.
Operational Risk –
1.
Basic Indicator Approach-
Average of total
income of last 3 years * Alpha (Currently 15%)
Financial Statements Screening
·
For each of the key expense components
on the income statement, calculate it as a %age of sales for each year.
·
Look for non-recurring or non-operating
items. These are "unusual" expenses not directly related to
ongoing operations.
·
Determine whether the company’s
dividend policies are supporting their strategies.
·
Examine the cash flow statement, which
gives information about the cash inflows and outflows from operations,
financing, and investing.
·
Whether fixed assets grown rapidly in
one or two years, due to acquisitions or new facilities? Has the
proportion of debt grown rapidly, to reflect a new financing strategy?
Forecasting
Attributes- Cumulative Accuracy Profile
It plots the empirical cumulative
distribution of the defaulting debtors ^ CD against the empirical cumulative
distribution of all debtors ^ CT. For a given rating category Ri, the %age of
all debtors with a rating of Ri or worse is determined. Next, the %age of
defaulted debtors with a rating score worse than or equal to Ri. This
determines the point A in Fig. 13.1. Completing this exercise for all rating
categories of a rating system determines the CAP curve. Therefore, every CAP
curve must start in the point (0, 0) and end in the point (1, 1).
Accuracy
Ratio = aR / aP,
aR is the area between the CAP curve of
the rating model and CAP curve of the random model.
aP is the area between the CAP curve of
the perfect forecaster and the CAP curve of the random model.
Basel 111- "Basel III is a comprehensive set of reform measures, developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management of the banking sector".
Basel 3 measures aim to:
→
improve the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks arising from financial
and economic stress, whatever the source . → improve risk management and
governance . → strengthen banks' transparency and disclosures.
Pillar 1 : Minimum Regulatory Capital
Requirements based on Risk Weighted Assets (RWAs) : Maintaining capital
calculated through credit, market and operational risk areas.Pillar 2 : Supervisory Review Process : Regulating tools and frameworks for dealing with peripheral risks that banks face.
Pillar 3: Increasing the disclosures that banks must provide to increase the transparency of banks
Major
Changes-
(a) Capital Conservation
Buffer: Banks
will be required to hold a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%. The aim
of asking to build conservation buffer is to ensure that banks maintain a
cushion of capital that can be used to absorb losses during periods of
financial and economic stress.
(b) Countercyclical Buffer: Basically to increase capital requirements in good
times and decrease the same in bad times. The buffer will slow
banking activity when it overheats and will encourage lending when times are
tough i.e. in bad times. The buffer will range from 0% to 2.5%,
consisting of common equity or other fully loss-absorbing capital.
(c) Minimum Common
Equity and Tier 1 Capital Requirements : The minimum requirement for common equity has
been raised under Basel III from 2% to 4.5% of total risk-weighted
assets. The overall Tier 1 capital requirement, consisting of not only
common equity but also other qualifying financial instruments, will also
increase from the current minimum of 4% to 6%. Although the minimum
total capital requirement will remain at the current 8% level, but will
increase to 10.5% when combined with the conservation buffer.
(d) Leverage Ratio A leverage ratio is the relative amount of
capital to total assets (not risk-weighted). This aims to put a cap
on swelling of leverage in the banking sector on a global
basis. 3% leverage ratio of Tier 1 will be tested before a
mandatory leverage ratio is introduced in January 2018.
Comparison of Capital Requirements
under Basel II and Basel III :
Requirements
|
Under
Basel II
|
Under
Basel III
|
Minimum Ratio of Total Capital To
RWAs
|
8%
|
10.50%
|
Minimum Ratio of Common Equity to
RWAs
|
2%
|
4.50%
to 7.00%
|
Tier I capital to RWAs
|
4%
|
6.00%
|
Core Tier I capital to RWAs
|
2%
|
5.00%
|
Capital Conservation Buffers to
RWAs
|
None
|
2.50%
|
Leverage Ratio
|
None
|
3.00%
|
Countercyclical Buffer
|
None
|
0%
to 2.50%
|
Minimum Liquidity Coverage Ratio
|
None
|
TBD
(2015)
|
Minimum Net Stable Funding Ratio
|
None
|
TBD
(2018)
|
Systemically important Financial
Institutions Charge
|
None
|
TBD
(2011)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment